A giant skinny Nick Gales menaces his smaller brother. |
A giant smiley dolphin menaces Trish Lavery |
She started by noting that whales are not uniformly
distributed across the oceans but associated with high productivity zones and
that fertilisation of the oceans causes carbon to be drawn down from the
atmosphere. Such fertilisation can be achieved by the defecation of whales –
and she gave a clear example using sperms whales which feed at depth but
defecate in the upper layers (in the photic/light zone) where the plant plankton
(which underpin the productivity of the whole ecosystem grow). This movement of
nutrients from the deeps means that sperm whales (at current population levels)
contribute to the addition of some 200,000 tonnes of carbon more than they are
using. Whaling has hugely reduced the
contribution that sperm whales now make.
Lavery also looked at blue whales – so like all baleen
species – they feed and defecate in the upper levels. Hence no net gain might
be expected and she commented on the advocacy from some to cull whales in
favour of fisheries interests; a ‘bottom-up’ view. She noted that there has
been a significant reduction in krill and that whilst this was typically linked
to climate change, the removal of whales by whaling might have have played a
part, noting that whaling selectively removed the older and bigger whales.
Lavery was able to show a possible moderate stimulation of krill caused by the
whales and she commented that whales being in balance with their ecosystem
might explain why they have survived 30 million years ‘without eating all the
fish’! She concluded by pondering about what other ‘ecosystem services’ the
whale might be providing.
Trish |
You can link to Trish Levry's publications which will give a more fulsome and authoritative account of her work via Researchgate HERE Incidentally in my blogs from meetings, I paraphrase what was said and strive for accuracy but welcome corrections.
It's all about the jet stream |
Jenifer Francis of Rutgers University spoke on ‘Crazy
Weather and the Arctic Meltdown’. She reminded us that CO2 in the atmosphere
was at its highest level for 800,000 years; that the resulting warming was not
evenly spread over the planet (with a particular focus in the Arctic).
She emphasised that weather was being driven by the Jet Stream - its strength and its location. A weak Jet Stream is being caused by
sea-ices loss in the Arctic which allows major heat loss to the atmosphere in
the winter.
And a weak Jet Stream tends to stay in one place – hence, relative
to what went before, weather systems tend to ‘get stuck’: this caused repeated
storms (including in the Arctic and over the UK for example) and droughts in
some places and enhanced precipitation elsewhere. The implications of this for
marine mammals include those relating to sea-ice loss and changes in productivity
- a theme picked up by the last speaker, Sue E Moore who spoke on ‘Marine
Mammals as Sentinels to Impacts of Climate Change on Arctic Ecosystems’. She
emphasised the likely movement of baleen whales north – so they may be net benefiters
– and also the less positive implications for those species that are dependent on
ice for resting and breeding (including walruses and polar bears).
No comments:
Post a Comment