Some of the discussions were difficult and, at times,
I feared that we might not reach conclusions by the end of the meeting, but we
did!
The table below
shows the list of resolutions discussed, amended and then (all bar one) endorsed.
Draft Resolution 6.1
|
Granting the Right to Vote
|
Draft Resolution 6.2
|
Amendments to the Headquarters Agreement with the Host Country
|
Draft Resolution 6.3
|
ACCOBAMS Staff
|
Draft Resolution 6.4
|
Amendments to the Rules of Procedures for the Bureau
|
Draft Resolution 6.5
|
Work Programme 2017-2019
|
Draft Resolution 6.6
|
Financial and Administrative Matters for the Triennium 2017-2019
|
Draft Resolution 6.7
|
Scientific Committee
|
Draft Resolution 6.8
|
Amendments to the Follow-up Procedure
|
Draft Resolution 6.9
|
Format for National Implementation Reports
|
Draft Resolution 6.10
|
Acceptance of the Amendments on the Extension of the ACCOBAMS
Geographical Scope
|
Draft Resolution 6.11
|
Scientific and Technical Cooperation between ACCOBAMS Parties and the
Red Sea States - WITHDRAWN
|
Draft Resolution 6.12
|
Strategical Alliance concerning Management and Conservation Measures
for the Mediterranean Environment between GFCM, RAC/SPA, and IUCN-Med in
Collaboration with MedPAN
|
Draft Resolution 6.13
|
Implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
and Relevant Ecosystem Approach Processes (EcAP)
|
Draft Resolution 6.14
|
Cetacean Population Estimates and Distribution in the ACCOBAMS Area
|
Draft Resolution 6.15
|
Population Structure Studies
|
Draft Resolution 6.16
|
Assessment of IUCN Conservation Status of Cetaceans in the ACCOBAMS
Area
|
Draft Resolution 6.17
|
Interactions between Fisheries and Cetaceans
|
Draft Resolution 6.18
|
Anthropogenic Noise
|
Draft Resolution 6.19
|
Implementation of an ACCOBAMS Certification for Highly Qualified
Marine Mammals Observers
|
Draft Resolution 6.20
|
Ship Strikes on cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea
|
Draft Resolution 6.21
|
Commercial Cetacean Watching Activities in the ACCOBAMS area
|
Draft Resolution 6.22
|
Species Conservation and Management Plans
|
Draft Resolution 6.23
|
Live Strandings
|
Draft Resolution 6.24
|
Capacity-Building
|
Draft Resolution 6.25
|
New Areas of Conservation of Cetacean Habitats
|
Draft Resolution 6.26
|
List of Resolutions into Force
|
Draft Resolution 6.27
|
Tribute to Organisers
|
Draft Resolution 6.28
|
Date, Venue and Funding of the Seventh Session of the Meeting of the
Parties
|
I will focus on a couple of these
1. The resolution on fisheries interactions
(Resolution 6.17) stands out as important. It speaks to various key strategic
collaborations including with the IWC which now has its own bycatch initiative.
Similarly, it picks up an idea that came from the ASCOBANS meeting (that’s the
COP of the more northerly sister agreement) to work jointly on this pressing
issue.
2. Noise [Resolution 6.18]: over the Agreement’s lifetime,
the issue of noise has come centre stage in the region. Early disbelief that
loud noise could really affect cetaceans followed by scepticism that live
strandings could be linked to military activities, have now fully given way to
a general acceptance that this is an issue and should be addressed. Resolution
6.18 now defines the approach to be taken by the parties and whilst complex, its
key points are the call “on
the Parties to undertake Strategic Impact Assessments (SIA), Environmental
Impact Assessments (EIA) and other relevant assessments such as Appropriate
Assessments (AA) under EU Habitat Directive prior to plans,
programmes and projects that may affect cetaceans and especially those
involving impulsive noise, noting that, as a minimum standard, such assessments
should:
·
provide
adequate information on baseline biological and environmental information to
describe the area being impacted;
·
fully
characterise operations and their acoustic components – this should include
professional modelling of the sound propagation features and the spatial region
that will experience anthropogenic noise above natural ambient sound levels;
·
assess the
impact on cetaceans within this area and consider the potential cumulative
effects from other anthropogenic activities;
·
describe
how the impacts are proposed to be mitigated and effectiveness monitored
before, during and after the operation; and
·
provide an
objective consideration of the risk posed by the proposed activity against
alternatives”
The resolution also requests the
Secretariat in consultation with the ACCOBAMS Scientific Committee to enter
dialogue with NATO and national navies of non-NATO countries as appropriate and
to show how the ACCOBAMS Scientific Committee can provide advice and assistance
with respect to mitigating adverse effects on cetaceans for any future exercises.
Further development of the concept of quiet zones was also mandated.
Other highlights included a call for
a Vessel Traffic Separation Scheme in the Hellenic Trench (off Greece) to
reduce ship strikes and the progress of the ACCOBAMS whale watching ‘label’.
This is an endorsement method for whale watching operations in the region to
try and ensure that they meet certain standards prescribed by the Agreement.
At the same time that all these complex matters
were being dealt with, the ACCOBAMS was also celebrating its twenthy birthday.
It did this with some style: first came the visit of Prince Albert II of Monaco
to open the meeting; then a reception in Monaco’s new Yacht Club (opened in
2014) and then another at the Oceanographic Museum’s magnificent banqueting
room; and then there were special coffee and tea breaks and lavish lunches (in
fact we were fed throughout the event). Never was an international meeting
better catered! And we all also brought home a cornucopia of gifts: ACCOBAMS-themed cap, robust tote bag, pen, sticker
and mouse-mat, plus several reports, a box of chocolates, a box of biscuits and, for those that
went on the Friday morning trip, their very own perfume!
Thank you ACCOBAMS Secretary and Monaco – that
was all very kind.
A cornucopia of ACCOBAMS gifts. |