About Me
- mrsimmondssays
- Live for today but work for everyone's tomorrow! Any views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organisation/institution I am affiliated with.
Friday, 27 March 2020
Tuesday, 24 March 2020
Sunday, 15 March 2020
Sunday, 8 March 2020
Greetings during the epidemic
Here Hannah and Mark explore how best to greet during the epidemic.
Note added later - we now appreciate that we should also stay at least 2 metres apart!
Hannah (wearing a fetching hat) attempts a hug!
But Uncle Mark says - No!
Handshake?
No, not that either.
So, what are the options?
1. Raising (or 'tipping') your hat (hence the hats)!
This is nicely British but perhaps impractical as a main form of greeting because you need a hat!
2. The salute!
Both easy and hygienic but perhaps too military and sometimes used in a mocking way!.
3. The Japanese foot-tap.
Because there is physical contact - still some chance of pathogen transfer
(also requires good sense of balance).
4. The elbow nudge
Probably more hygienic than a hand-shale but, as we are encouraged to sneeze and cough into our elbows, perhaps not optimal.
5. 'Prayer-hands'
We quite quite liked this gentle greeting but not as much as option 6.
6. The head bob and heart touch.
So, this is a slight bow (from the neck) and then you touch your hand to the middle of your chest (roughly where your heart is) and you can keep your hand there longer if you wish to express a stronger pleasure in seeing the other person.
This is also best accompanied by eye contact and a smile!
This is also best accompanied by eye contact and a smile!
Saturday, 29 February 2020
Thursday, 27 February 2020
A visit to an Indian wetland - Nasarovar in Gujarat
| Sunrise over Nasarovar - viewed from out on the lake in small skiff. |
![]() |
| Purple swamp hen |
![]() |
| Purple heron |
| A brown-headed gull. |
| Marsh harrier (not a great photo - but seen overhead several times) |
| brown-headed gulls around a fishing boat |
| Glossy Ibis |
| Indian black-winged stilt |
| putative eastern yellow wagtail |
| Indian house crow |
![]() |
| Island in the lake where visitors are taken to be offered tea, coffee and snacks - brown-headed gulls in attendance. |
| Tower on the island - watch that first step! |
| Tea making camp - one of several on the shore under simple awnings and adorned with colourful carpets |
| brown-headed gulls |
| marsh harrier |
| Large egret |
| Other keen photographers out on the lake |
| Red-wattled lapwing |
| Travelling companions. |
![]() |
| Mark Simmonds. |
![]() |
| Purple swamp hens |
There were also some impressive animals on the road to the wetlands:
Tuesday, 25 February 2020
Save the Migratory Species in 2020 - the culture intervention from the United Kingdom
| The walkway outside the meeting rooms for CoP13 |
Sunday, 23 February 2020
Save the migratory species in 2020 - the harbour porpoise at CoP 13
HSI and three other non-governmental organisations brought a proposal for a concerted action for two European harbour porpoise populations.
You can find the proposal - which was agreed by the meeting - HERE.
And the speech presenting it was as follows:
Thank you – I am honoured to present this proposal to the
CoP contained in document 28.2.7 Rev on the behalf of four non-governmental
organisations Humane Society International, Orca, Whale and Dolphin
Conservation and Coalition Clean Baltic.
Chairman, as we have just heard in the context of several
other species, the history of small cetacean conservation around the world is indeed
increasingly an unhappy one, as we repeatedly move too slowly to recognise
problems and respond to diminishing populations.
This proposal for a concerted action is focused on two
small, distinct and imperilled populations of porpoise , Phocoena phocoena, - a species in all too
many ways similar to the vaquita. The first population, the Baltic harbour
porpoise sits in its limited range balanced on the edge of extinction and has
long been recognised to be in need of urgent conservation action; the second,
the population of the Iberian peninsula has been more recently recognised as
distinctive. There is considerable evidence that the effects of removals mainly
resulting from fisheries activities and other factors, including chemical
pollution, affecting these populations are unsustainable and the road to their extinction
is paved with our indifference.
The proposal reflects the desire of the proponent
organisations to support the range states in implementing timely actions. These
populations are covered by two of the CMS daughter agreements – ASCOBANS and
ACCOBAMS – and an action plan – the Jastarnina Plan for the Baltic porpoise –
and we strongly support these agreements and this plan. However, plans and words
must now result in real actions.
Chairman, we have listened to many discussions about the
critical situation of the Baltic porpoise over more than two decades and with
my NGO colleagues and other experts we have helped to develop plans for it – but
the reality is that it survives now only in spite of our inaction, not because
of our actions.
Hence, we also respectfully request the range states to list
the populations appropriately on the CMS appendices as soon as possible and implement
appropriate actions before it is too late. For these populations and for many other
small cetaceans around the world, unless we swiftly recognise their situation
and appropriately respond, one by one they will simply wink out of existence. The
world will then be a poorer place; the ecosystems less complete and more
fragile; and our children will never get to see an animal that was once common
in inshore waters across Europe.
++++
![]() |
| Watching the stamps being created |
ssss
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















